[ad_1]
In October last year, the CCI imposed a Rs 936 crore fine on Google for abusing its dominance in the in-app payment system and asked the company to allow the use of third-party billing. In this case, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) was to hear the matter on November 28 but it has now adjourned the final hearing.
“Please take notice that the following matter listed on 28.11.2023 in the Court of Chairperson will not be taken up.The next date of Hearing will be notified later,” said a notification from the NCLAT.
What’s the case
Google was fined in two separate cases. In one case, the tribunal asked the company to stop forcing developers to use its Play Store payment system that charges a commission of up to 30%. Google argued that the service fee it charges is used to support investments in the Google Play app store and the Android mobile operating system, and covers developer tools and analytic services.
Google User Choice Billing system
Google also piloted and then established the User Choice Billing system, app developers are required to pay 11%-26% commission to Google. It also said that by allowing other app stores, about 700 million Android users may be harmed.
Google argued that devices built on incompatible ‘forks’ would prevent Google from securing them, as these versions will not support the security and user safety features that Google provides.
It noted that a lack of robust and consistent security upgrades will leave the users of these devices exposed to cybercrime, bugs and malware.
The company also explained how predatory apps expose users to financial fraud, data theft and a number of other online dangers, it cannot provide security to Android users if apps are downloaded from app stores other than Google Play store.
“Please take notice that the following matter listed on 28.11.2023 in the Court of Chairperson will not be taken up.The next date of Hearing will be notified later,” said a notification from the NCLAT.
What’s the case
Google was fined in two separate cases. In one case, the tribunal asked the company to stop forcing developers to use its Play Store payment system that charges a commission of up to 30%. Google argued that the service fee it charges is used to support investments in the Google Play app store and the Android mobile operating system, and covers developer tools and analytic services.
Google User Choice Billing system
Google also piloted and then established the User Choice Billing system, app developers are required to pay 11%-26% commission to Google. It also said that by allowing other app stores, about 700 million Android users may be harmed.
Google argued that devices built on incompatible ‘forks’ would prevent Google from securing them, as these versions will not support the security and user safety features that Google provides.
It noted that a lack of robust and consistent security upgrades will leave the users of these devices exposed to cybercrime, bugs and malware.
The company also explained how predatory apps expose users to financial fraud, data theft and a number of other online dangers, it cannot provide security to Android users if apps are downloaded from app stores other than Google Play store.
[ad_2]
Source link